Wow.
I don't think I've ever watched a movie that made me think so much about what was going and what it actually all meant at the end. If I watch it again I'll probably see things I missed before and come up with entirely new theories on what everything exactly meant. As you can probably tell I really enjoyed this movie, I think even if you hated this movie you could still appreciate the movie for how it made you think.
There are going to be two parts to this review; first being the actual review and second being my interpretation of it, this part will container spoilers so if you haven't seen the movie then you'll probably want to skip that part until you see it.
Review- First off, the acting was great I have no complaints there. The characters were very interesting and engaging. The plot and pacing were excellent and it pretty easy for you to invest yourself completely in the movie. A really big plus for me was, again, that it really made you think and the movie didn't have an ending where everything was wrapped in a nice, neat bow but one that was open and left for interpretation. The CG was very good. But my favorite thing of all is the totally original concept, I've never once heard of the idea of collective dreaming, stealing ideas through dreams or the idea of planting an idea in their head through dreams. Its a rare thing to have never heard of an idea before.
On the negative side, if you're not 100% invested in this movie you will not get what's happening. It can be confusing and hard to follow but if you're really paying attention it shouldn't be a problem. There are also so plot holes and things that are a little too convenient but they really don't hit you while you're watching the movie, if you catch them they're probably afterward while you're thinking about it. But depending on you're interpretation of it the plot holes could not be plot holes but supporting clues.
The worst part was the wasted potential though. They are creating dreams but never once do they descended into a nightmare or something that made zero sense like a green sky, monsters popping out of nowhere, that kind of stuff. It makes me sad that they didn't do awesome stuff like that but at the same time I'm really excited for a (good) sequel or (good) spin offs for it at the same time. Not with the same characters because I don't want them to ruin what our interpretations of it was but with an entirely new team.
But the bad really never detracted from the movie. While the movie may have not been a masterpiece it was one of the best movies I've seen in a long time and one that succeeded in being true art, getting you to mull over your feelings on it and what it actually meant long after you saw it.
Inception gets a 9 out of 10, terrific.
Interpretation: Beware there are spoilers aheadI thought Cobb's wife Mal symbolized both his guilt and his ties to his past that compels him to recreate her in his dreams, skewing his sense of reality, she also interferes with present, screwing up his operations, and keeps him from seeing the future, symbolized by his children. Until he finally lets go of Mal at the end of the movie its only then can return to reality and his children and move on.
And then they did the mind fuck at the end with the top.
At first I thought it was reality because when top was spinning it was wobbling a bit. The top is Cobb's totem, an object which people that go into dreams make for themselves to prove they're not in a dream, Arthur has a loaded die that only he knows its weight and what number it'll land on, Cobb's top will keep spinning in a dream but eventually will fall down if he's in reality.
But the more I think about it the more I'm in the 'its all a dream boat.' In 'reality' Cobb is being chased by a faceless organization, which is a common theme in nightmares. When he's trying to hide in a cafe the waiter outs him because he starts yelling at Cobb for no apparent reason, if you screw too much with the physics of a dream the projections, people that inhabit dreams as a piece of the subconscious, will turn hostile. When Cobb goes through an narrow space between buildings to escape towards the end of it Cobb is stuck good and has quite a hard time getting out, a common claustrophobic nightmare scenario. When he does get out of the niche Saito is waiting just on the other side of it for him, something that only happens in dreams.
Then I cam across this article
chud.com/articles/articles/244… in combination with this one
www.theawl.com/2010/07/the-key…. Both of which I agree with.
Basically both say that
Inception is a giant allegory for movie making. Cobb is the director, Arthur is the producer, Eames is the actor, Saito is the funding, Ariadne the writer, Yusuf is the technical guy, Mal is Cobb's inspiration and FIscher is the audience. Projections could also be seen as the potential for a hostile audience. The more you screw with a dream the more the projections realize you're not supposed to be there until they force you out. In movies, the audience goes in with suspended disbelief but the more unbelievable actions, dialogue, fight scenes, explosions, etc. happens the more they realize they've wasted their money on a crappy movie and that's the last thing a director wants.
Mal is beautiful and seductive but ultimately destructive if that's all you have, with her screwing up Cobb's operations and shooting Fischer. At one part she asks Ariadne is she knows what it feels like to be a half of a whole, with that kind of passion there is no room for anything else, not even their children. But later when Cobb has to choose between Mal or Fischer he ultimately shoots Mal because all of what Fischer is going through has become more important to him then his own vision. Even though Cobb never sees his ultimate revelation, he trusts that Fischer will have it.
As for the ending, with the movie allegory theory, here's how it goes. When Fischer gets his epiphany at the end, while the whole thing is just a dream, his emotions are very real and that's what's important. We're never given an answer if the top keeps spinning because the movie is asking us 'does it matter if it wasn't real?'